Quantum of Solace Film Review

Daniel Craig Returns as James Bond in a Too-Transitory Action Film

© Nick Rogers

Nov 13, 2008
Daniel Craig in Quantum of Solace, Karen Ballard
James Bond films should be more than efficient entertainment, but Quantum of Solace scales back the grandeur and bold character re-development of 2006's Casino Royale.

Burly, surly and with the pugnacious approach of a scent-tracking dog, Daniel Craig re-built the perfect James Bond in 2006’s Casino Royale. His newbie Bond was walking blunt-force trauma – a violent spy who gradually appreciated side benefits of spirits and sex in the way an animal would treats during obedience training.

And yet, with a more trigger-happy Bond, Royale carried the flag for the film series’ glamour and grandeur – luxurious Montenegro locations, attitudinal combat of the poker games, nifty heart paddles craftily hidden within a luxury-car compartment.

Craig is still dazzling, but Quantum of Solace is all go-go-go – an efficient, mostly entertaining action-packed revenge coda to the Royale plot that nevertheless feels like tossed-off transition than tactile Bond.

Jittery is the last thing Bond movies should be, but director Marc Forster – better known for Oscar-nominated dramas like Monster’s Ball or Finding Neverland – confusingly conceives and cuts too much of the action and character beats.

With the help of second-unit director / stuntman god Dan Bradley and Craig’s incendiary conflict of duty and emotion, Forster finds his way. But Quantum lacks the suavity of Royale and is about as much a journeyman-action film as Bond can be.

Quantum of Solace Picks Up Plot Mere Minutes After Casino Royale Left Off

Those quick cuts ruin what could have been a timelessly thrilling car-chase opening – one with hellacious vehicular stunts and a wicked kicker tying the film directly to Royale. (Those who’ve forgotten much of Royale would do well to watch it again.)

At Royale’s end, Bond had been betrayed, but also saved, by Vesper Lynd – the agent with whom he’d worked to bring down the villainous Le Chiffre. In Quantum, he’s tracking her killers on a trail that leads him to Dominic Greene (Mathieu Amalric).

Greene operates Greene Planet, an environmental-betterment charity. But Greene’s championing of natural resources is just a rope-a-dope for environmental terrorism – renewing his finances’ energy through sizable deals with shady dictators.

No stranger to physical characterization after The Diving Bell and the Butterfly, Amalric plays Greene with a quasi-slumped body and fascist-dictator bangs. Neither Greene, nor his lackeys are particularly menacing, but Greene has one heckuva girlish scream.

Teamed up with Camille (Olga Kurylenko) – a tanned, toned kewpie-doll lookalike of Catherine Zeta-Jones scorned by Greene – Bond hunts his prey. But when he’s disobedient one time too many to orders from his superior, M (Judi Dench), Bond is disavowed and must gain intel from recurrent Royale characters Rene Mathis (Giancarlo Giannini) and Felix Leiter (Jeffrey Wright) – both potentially duplicitous.

James Bond? More Like Jason Bourne Until Action Carries Bond-Blend Aroma

An early rooftop chase and a hotel brawl are shameless derivatives of the latter-two Jason Bourne films. Another Way To Die, the film’s theme, has a great groove, but horrid, screechy vocals from Alicia Keys and Jack White. And in a construction-rigging grapple, it’s impossible to tell who’s twisting where or why.

Just when you’re not sure how much of a Bond movie it is, Quantum begins to open up with relaxed humor (a joke about teachers on sabbatical is perfectly, droll), snazzy setpieces (a surveillance sting set during Giacomo Puccini’s Tosca surprises with its striking stylishness) and only-in-a-Bond-movie locales (a hotel run on fuel cells in the middle of the desert).

While Quantum redeems itself – and explains its silly title as something more than having a smidge of comfort – it’s time for this rebooted Bond to get mission-based. Craig has done a fine job of molding Bond to his acting strengths. With more confident direction, he’s capable of providing more than a quantum of excitement in this franchise.


The copyright of the article Quantum of Solace Film Review in Action Films is owned by Nick Rogers. Permission to republish Quantum of Solace Film Review in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.


Daniel Craig in Quantum of Solace, Karen Ballard
       


Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo

Comments
Nov 17, 2008 1:03 PM
Guest :
Great Review!!!!!
Jan 2, 2009 11:46 AM
Guest :
Without a doubt, Connery & Brosnan were the gold standard of Bond & my darkest days where during Moore’s farcical portrayal of our favorite 00. So I am pre-disposed not to accept Craig as a bone fide replacement. But even in both movies, Craig is not the problem, the producers & directors are. OK. Perhaps my last comments were really a review of Casino not having seen QoS. Now I have seen it and there are so many problems with it I do not know where to begin. All the chases are herky, jerky, shaky staccato film clips. You can never really see what is going on. This is contrary to the traditional Bond flick replete with detail. And if Craig is gritty, moody, mean & vindictive one can still see a path by which he becomes a cooler if not a cold, uber-professional agent with a dry, sardonic sense of humor. This Bond clearly appeals to a feminine perspective that escapes me. I understood him not becoming 'involved' with the other women in the 2 flicks as having high standards and was at least relieved to see his response to Fields as, what we would term a normal orientation! (The women seem to love that Bond does NOT 'hook up' with the main girl in either film and broods ceaselessly like a forlorn Hamlet for his unrequited lover from Casino). Even the opening chase, usually one of the best, is almost visually incomprehensible. Car chase, rooftop chase, sewer chase, apartment knife fight chase, boat chase, plane chase, Chase-Morgan, certainly they all were purloined from the Bourne genre but somehow Bourne's were more believable.

The opening graphics were not as bad as I feared, but were definitely not 007 quality. Far too much of Craig shooting his Walther PPK .380; (don't make me go into why that is a problem). We have grown accustomed to the sultry, sexual/sensual and awesome graphical intro to the Bond films. This one was not of the same caliber. Ditto on the theme song. It was not a good as past songs but I was fearing worse and it was actually passable relating somewhat to the general theme of the film. The barrel scene was placed at the end of the film. I prefer the beginning but in either case it should be presented with high quality graphics and punctuated with 007 theme song riffs. It was not.

Lots of chases. Most are barely watchable. I actually liked the reference to the traditional 13th century Italian Palio horse race in which the riders can use their longer wooden canes to encourage their steeds or discourage their opponents; and the actua
2 Comments