Indiana Jones 4 Review

An In-Depth Analysis on the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull

© Michael Peters

May 23, 2008
Poster for Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, www.canmag.com
On May 22, 2008, the fourth installment of Indiana Jones was finally released entitled Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull. Was it worth the wait?

It has now been nineteen years since the third and (apparent) final installment of Indiana Jones hit theatres. In 1989, it appeared that Indiana had partaken in his final adventure (in Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade) as the whip cracking hero. However, after numerous story ideas and a revolving door of screenwriters, the series has finally struck back with a vengeance in 2008.

Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull is the embodiment of what a summer movie should be. Action, adventure, comedy and preposterous plots help to define what a summer movie is and these categories truly hold meaning for this film. Yet for all the action that is included, there is a limited use of computer generated imagery (CGI) present. In more ways then one, the film relies heavily on old school tactics (stunt man as opposed to computer effects) to not so much create a sense of realism but as to create a sense of nostalgia.

The film truly embraces its past. Just because technology has advanced does not mean it needs to be exploited for the purpose of creating a greater sense of adventure. Indiana Jones works as a result of the audiences’ previous understanding of this character. He is not perfect and is constantly captured. He is an accidental hero improvising the steps. Yet, he is more real as a result and that is what perhaps makes him so relatable.

This being said, the film is more then just mindless entertainment. Starring a now 65 year old Harrison Ford and directed by veteran Steven Spielberg, the Indiana Jones series has become a reinvigorated and fresh adventure to be embraced by everyone.

The Plot of the Crystal Skull

Indiana Jones' (Harrison Ford) newest adventure begins in the desert Southwest in 1957 -- the height of the Cold War. Indy and his sidekick Mac (Ray Winstone) have barely escaped a close scrape with nefarious Soviet agents on a remote airfield. Now, Professor Jones has returned home to Marshall College -- only to find things have gone from bad to worse. His close friend and dean of the college (Jim Broadbent) explains that Indy's recent activities have made him the object of suspicion, and that the government has put pressure on the university to fire him.

On his way out of town, Indiana meets rebellious young Mutt (Shia LaBeouf), who carries both a grudge and a proposition for the adventurous archaeologist: If he'll help Mutt on a mission with deeply personal stakes, Indy could very well make one of the most spectacular archaeological finds in history -- the Crystal Skull of Akator, a legendary object of fascination, superstition and fear (Synopsis from Tribute.ca).

That is all that will be mentioned as it in the viewer’s best interest to discover the wonders of this film firsthand. With this being said, the film does magnificently capture the 1950s era through its focus on the threat of Communism, the Cold War, nuclear bombs, Harley Davidson’s and leather jackets, the emergence of rock n’ roll, greasers and a new found fascination with U.F.O.’s.

For anyone who has seen an Indiana Jones film, the structure of the plot will not deviate from past experiences. There are chases sequences, vile enemies, disgusting creatures, over-the-top wild action and so on. The film follows the previous three films construction to a tee but yet stands on its own as a wonderful piece of escapism. One truly gets a sense of wonderment as the action and plot unfolds onscreen.

The Characters of Indiana Jones

Whereas most summer films displace characterization with action, Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull has an intent focus on building character relations in association with creating nail-biting tension. As a result, the characters are wonderfully brought to life through a wide arrange of award winning actors (such as John Hurt).

However, it is Cate Blanchett as Irina Spalko that truly mesmerizes the eyes. She is cold and calculating and dominates every frame she is in. She is perhaps one of the strongest female characters in recent memory on the big screen. Blanchett’s acting range can hardly be compared to anyone else at the present moment and her turn as a truly vindictive villainous adds yet more range to her already impressive resume.

With that being said, the film would not survive ten minutes if it were not for Harrison Ford. Ford is not the greatest or most compelling actor ever but he is extremely charismatic. He magnetically holds the glance of the audience. Not just because he is Indiana Jones but rather because of his nonchalant approach to playing this now iconic character. He was born for the role.

It would have been a tremendous shame if the film had not lived up to expectations (though it is not a perfect film). Threatening the iconic status of the series with one final showing may have contaminated what had previously come before it. However, the film is extremely entertaining and, though it may not live up to Raiders of the lost Ark (1981), it is still a relevant piece of escapist fare and deserves to be mentioned alongside the previous trilogy as a worthy ally.


The copyright of the article Indiana Jones 4 Review in Action Films is owned by Michael Peters. Permission to republish Indiana Jones 4 Review in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.


Poster for Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, www.canmag.com
       


Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo

Comments
Jun 11, 2008 7:05 AM
Guest :
Well, this is it you see. I liked the film. Really I did. It was entertaining. It was fun. Quick fix, 2 pints, Friday night film fun. Leave your brain at the door and enjoy the ride. But the problem for me is that my heart was left at the door too. For me, at no point did the film transcend being just ‘fun’ into something heartfelt and emotive. I didn’t feel emotionally engaged to any of the characters and even as I desperately wallowed in sentiment soaked, wide eyed optimism I just couldn’t feel engaged to even, dare I say, our beloved Indy.
These films (as any kid in the 80's will agree) are more than just fun. They’re great. Seminal. Think of the tension felt in the opening sequence of ‘Raiders’; Sweat beading off out protagonists face as he balances the bag of sand with the golden statue. Or the genuinely moving realisation at the end of ‘Last Crusade’ that his love for his father remains far greater than any material possession, reaching this powerful clarity when he calls him ‘Indiana’.
It had the car chases, it had the candle lit chambers, the comically megalomaniacal villain but it all felt like a classic case of syntax with no semantics. It was a caricature of an Indiana Jones film, rather than being an Indiana Jones film in its own right.
1 Comment: